Disc-ussion: Remembering the RCA CED System

rca-ced-adBring the magic home….RCA! Bring the magic home…RCA! Bring the magic home…RCA! Bring the magic home…RCA!

 And so it went. Over and over again.

The jingle was amplifying through the Movies Unlimited store on Castor Ave. in the Oxford Circle section of Northeast Philadelphia.

It rattled the glass doors in front of the Warner Brothers VHS and Beta titles. It ricocheted off the truncated wooden display cabinets housing what little Super 8mm films were left in the store.  And it traveled through the air, out the door and caught the ears of eager customers clamoring to get into the store to rent such hot new releases as Flash Gordon, The Blue Lagoon and My Bodyguard.

The damn jingle emanated from a display unit situated just to the left of the sale counter. Located towards the back of the store, the unit consisted of a TV—maybe 17 inches in size—two rotating carousels of RCA disc covers, and a locked case with some of the best-selling discs.

What were these CED discs and what was the magic all about?

CED discs were the new kid on the block, or at least the new format in a young industry. According to reports and spiels from Sid Goldstein, our amiable RCA salesman, it was going to revolutionize the industry. At Movies Unlimited, where customers waited in long lines on weekends to rent movies on VHS and Beta, and would even spend money to rent an exercise tape if there was no movie of appreciable value left on the shelves, was a revolution necessary at the time?

Well, RCA certainly thought so. The quality, they and their colorful pamphlets said, were superior at least to VHS, if not Beta. The prices were reasonable, too, designed with collectors in mind. No need for movie fans to spend $29.95, $59.95 or even $79.95 for a movie anymore. The CEDs were priced mostly in the $15-$23 range.

At the time, Movies Unlimited was a hub where film lovers could talk about movies, and rent or buy old or out-of-print titles. Promoting the new format made sense, although the steady clientele saw nothing wrong with the $700-plus VHS and Betamaxes they already owned.

But there were differences—genuine positive differences—with the CED format, which used a stylus to play the recorded information on each disc.

Aside from the price, the CED format offered other things appealing to collectors.  RCA had licensed titles from most of the majors, so there was a sizable library with steady releases. They were formatted like record albums—remember them?—with snazzy cover art and info about the contents on the back, which made them naturals for people who wanted to acquire a library of favorite films. The cost of the player was considerably less than VCRs or Betamaxes that went for several hundred dollars or more at the time, too.

Movies Unlimited had a nice salesperson from RCA at the time, the aforementioned Sid. He said this was the future of home entertainment, and some people half-believed him. Sid also could have told you the future of the beverage industry was “New Coke,” and “Ford Pinto” was the greatest car ever, and you’d believe him, too.

 “Your cash is good at the b…Your cash is good at the b…Your cash is good at the b…”

Damn thing was skipping. Let’s try another CED copy of Casablanca.

“Tell me, who was it you left me for? Was it Las…Tell me, who was it you left me for? Was it Las… Tell me, who was it you left me for? Was it Las…”

Different disc, same movie, different place. To paraphrase Mel Brooks’ Governor LePetomaine in Blazing Saddles: “Fricking things are warped!”

Just a few bugs in the system, but were they bugs the high-tech electronic exterminators could fix?

The CED disc, years in development at the cost of hundreds of millions to RCA, skipped. Time and time again, as time went by.

Those who purchased the CED players weren’t happy, and word filtered out to the street. RCA denied the claims, but other problems persisted. Since the machines worked like record players, styluses wore out and needed to be replaced. They didn’t record broadcasts like VCRs. Discs were required to be flipped, because one hour’s playback was the maximum on each side.

According to the comprehensive tribute website www.cedmagic.com, RCA forecast 200,000 players to be sold in 1981. Only half that amount got pushed out of stores. A positive prediction by the company had 30-50% of American households having CED players in their homes within ten years, with sales of players and discs topping $7 billion.

rca-ced-gene-kellyThe numbers were certainly impressive enough to get video stores to jump on board. A chief problem, however, was that consumers were perfectly fine with their VCRs. If, perhaps, RCA had come out a few years earlier with their baby—say, 1977, before VHS and Beta began their ascension in popularity—CEDs would have had a better chance to click. But those few years obviously made a difference.

Meanwhile, another format was rising in popularity, a format actually introduced earlier than CED: Laserdisc. MCA partnered with IBM to launch DiscoVision in the late 1960s, but the first machine wasn’t found in stores until the late 1970s.  Like RCA, licenses from most of the major studios were acquired, but the format, an optical system, didn’t need a stylus that had to be replaced, or a platter that tended to skip. Hardcore movie fans, audiophiles and videophiles cast their vote, choosing Laser—with its more eclectic selections, video and audio quality supremacy, and special edition multi-disc sets—over CED.

At Movies Unlimited, returns of defective CED discs were steady. It wasn’t long before the RCA display was supplanted by a bookcase filled with blank VHS and Beta tapes, as well as Amaray videotape cases purchased by customers who taped programs and movies off of TV.

At the end of 1983, sources note that RCA sold less than 500,000 units in total—that was the number estimated for its first year alone. The retail price of the basic CED player dropped from a few hundred dollars to $149.99. In April 1984, RCA halted production.  

At flea markets in the Philadelphia area, CED discs were stuffed into paper box bins, selling for a dollar or two.

Nobody was bringing “the magic” home any more.

This is the latest in a series of recollections being featured on MovieFanFare in honor of Movies Unlimited’s 35th Anniversary.

  • Wayne P.

    Vinyl was already on the way out in recorded sound but yet RCA with CEDs was just coming out as a visual movie medium…what were they thinking? I wonder why Laserdisc, with its optical reader format thats evolved into what we have now with HD DVD, Blu-Ray and enhanced computerized film technology, took so long to supplant the VHS/Betamax VCR era of video watching? That would prove to be the superior quality solution that has lasted the longest…at least until the next best (and smallest) new thing comes out!

  • Nick Z

    Fascinating read and ah yes, I remember it well for all the aforementioned reasons. Being a collector with well over 3000 movies in my private library I went the route from VHS to laserdisc to DVD to Blu-ray. Now we have Red Ray, or soon will. What I am tired of is the forced obsolescence imposed on private collectors to constantly switch and upgrade. So long as quality was constantly improving I suppose I could justify switching formats.

    But man in general, and this one in particular does not live by technological advancements alone. You do need to pay for other things. The RCA ‘revolution’ notwithstanding, movie collecting today has become about as fun these days as having a root canal. Remember waaaay back in 1997 when they told us DVD was the be all and end all of home entertainment? Then came Blu. Now comes Red. I can already predict ‘green’ on the horizon – $10′s, $20′s, $50′s and so on to get the consumer hooked all over again while the studios continue to release the say two to three hundred titles already mastered in hi-def while neglecting the thousands of titles still absent from the home video scene. Dumb! Really dumb!

    This, of course, is to say nothing of the format wars you briefly mentioned herein. VHS vs. Betamax, CED vs Laserdisc, DVD vs DIVX, Bluray vs HD – and who knows what else. Your article reminded me just how ridiculous ‘hard copy’ home video was and has continued to devolve into a medium most are willing to ditch in its entirety for streaming and downloads – legal or otherwise.

  • Steve D

    Back in ’81 I recorded a promotional tape for RCA Selectivision. I still have a copy & it’s kind of funny to listen to now. Kind of nostalgic though.

  • williamsommerwerck

    I made the mistake of buying CED (rather than LV), thinking it would fall closer in quality to the latter than VHS. It looked more like cleaned-up VHS. I didn’t have much of a problem with skipping.
    It’s interesting that RCA put about as much money into CED as Polaroid did into the SX-70, when you consider that the latter is a considerably more-complex system that required inventions that seemed impossible at the time.
    By the way, CED recordings are not “played” with a stylus. (The groove itself is featureless and does not carry information.) The stylus simply guides the capacitance pickup (which is part of the stylus). The disk does wear, however. Repeated plays gradually roughen the surface, which increases the noise level.
    I’m 65. I own a Sony Blu-ray player and 60″ Pioneer plasma display. BDs are generally better than /any/ film-based projection (other than imax, of course). I have no intention (nor the money) of switching to any new format.

  • S. R. Malone

    I bought this system when it came out and invested a lot of money in the discs. Eventually I even found a 2nd generation player for about 1/2 what RCA was selling them for originally to have in reserve because the first player started acting weird after about a year. It was hard to find the discs in stores, and nearly every disc skipped or froze at some point. It was a horrible system, and one of the worst expenditures of money I ever made as far as electronics were concerned. RCA did little to support it after a year or so, and customer support and service were badly lacking.

  • Joseph23006

    I had the Capacitence Encoded Disc player for quite a few years, when I first got it the picture quality was much better the the tapes I had seen at the time. I had a nice collection of movies, installed a new stylus when it began doing quirky things. I took it out of service and had it in the basement while I checked electonic people I knew to look at it, unfortunatelt Ivan in 2004 hit the Pittsburgh area and 25 inches of water solved my problem along with the freezed, washer, and dryer. As for skipping, I’ve had more of that with DVDs and Blu-Ray than the CEDor my Laserdisc!

  • Jim in Utah

    My brief excursion into the CED format yielded several discs that skipped, a dealer who tired of exchanging bad disks, and a quick move to laserdisc. We gave our CED equipment and discs to a thrift store. We still use laserdiscs, but have DVD and Blu-ray collections as well. Laserdisc players still show up in thrift stores for about $20 in working condition. Our inventory of the three disc formats is over 5300 titles, with only a few duplicates. Enough to keep us watching for a very long time.

  • nicolas

    Interesting story. I did not even know this foremat existed, though I might have actually seen something like this at a Sears store. I bought my first VCR (VHS) on Christmas 1983. Lazer Discs I think came out around the same time, I believe that Criterions first two releases in in 84 were King Kong and Citizen Kane, the earlier flim with an audio commentary (was that the first film with an audio commentary?) I bought my first laser disc player in 91. Some of the laser discs by Criterion I think are superior at least in content to some later DVD’S. Criterions High Noon I think has a wonderful audio commentary (very humorous) though the regular sound to me is scratchy) also I actually think that La Aventura, the DVD suffers because of a famous writing that Antonioni did about modern man suffers with Jack Nicholson reading it, when it is better to read it yourself on the laser disc supplements themselves. I also own a copy of Criterion From Russia With Love with audio commentary that Albert Broccoli was upset about that he forced Criterion to pull them from the market (Goldfinger and Dr. No included)

  • Arby

    I was a proud owner the RCA system, It was an inexpensive way at the time to start collecting movies. When RCA decided to drop the format, I went down to LA to a company that I bought my films from. They had clearance sale. It was worth the trip I got over $300 worth of films for about $75. I started my first home festival 30 years ago because of that system. I finally stopped using it about two years ago, when I needed shelf space for my other equipment. I have 300 films titles that I have slowly replaced with DVD/Blue Ray. In fact I am donating the whole package to a electronic recycle place in Sunnyvale during Spring Break. I enjoyed the system and it met my requirements at the time.