This is Character Witness: One actor, two film roles. You’re the judge andjury, telling us which portrayal was the best. The most memorable. Or iconic. Or simply your favorite.
But before you pass judgment, here’s a few words defending the “character” of each…
The case for Del Griffith
John Candy could have portrayed Del Griffith as just another piece of baggage that Neal Page (Steve Martin) has to lug around while desperately trying to get home for Thanksgiving in John Hughes’ comedy Planes, Trains and Automobiles. But instead of playing an annoying fat slob sidekick Candy breathes life into his character, giving him depth & dimension as opposed to simple girth. The travelling salesman is resourceful, witty and overbearing. He is irritating yet loveable; naive yet street smart. Del also harbors a dark secret that Candy hints at ever-so-subtly. Back in 1987 Gene Siskel praised his performance as his best to date; now, some 30 years later, one can definitely make a case of leaving off the “to date” part.
The case for Buck Russell
Directionless, disheveled, carefree bachelor Uncle Buck is the last resort of his brother & sister-in-law to take care of their three children while away. In a movie jam-packed with hilarious scenes, it is in Buck’s reflective ruminations on his own shortcomings and tension-filled interactions with his rebellious niece Tia that Candy truly excels. When a spiteful Tia reminds Buck of his own hypocrisy regarding being told what to do he knows he’s been busted. This is his turning point as de facto parent: overcoming his fear of responsibility. He does not handle the transition gracefully. That’s the point. Within the framework of a classic ‘80s teen comedy, it’s in these moments of uncertainty and trepidation that we see Candy’s best dramatic work.
Now that you’ve heard the arguments for both it’s time to render your verdict!